When Crack Was King: A Disappointment in Potential
When I stumbled upon Donovan X. Ramsey’s When Crack Was King: A People’s History of a Misunderstood Era, I felt a spark of curiosity that set me on a hopeful path. With its intriguing title and the praise it received from trusted sources, I thought this could be my ticket into a deeper understanding of a crucial period in America’s socio-political landscape. Plus, it fit the criteria for my home library system’s Read More in 2024 Challenge, focusing on nonfiction about science (though let’s be honest, I was wary of anything too scientific). However, 12 hours later, as I wrapped up the audiobook on Libby, I (rather dramatically) lamented: what a waste of my precious time!
From the outset, I felt the promise of a nuanced exploration of the crack epidemic, especially through the lens of those born during its height—what Ramsey terms the "second-generation survivors." This demographic, comprising mostly younger Gen X and older Millennials, carries the heavy weight of observing the chaos without being directly involved. This angle intrigued me; here was an opportunity to explore how the epidemic shaped a generation’s views on substance use, perhaps even fostering greater empathy for those most affected. But as I dove deeper, the book began to unravel, revealing itself to be an underwhelming collection of personal stories shackled by a narrow focus and a lack of broader analysis.
Ramsey starts strong, vividly painting the political and social context leading up to the crack epidemic. His discussions on the dissolution of the Great Migration, civil rights movements, and the rise of the Black middle class were engaging and well-researched. There were moments where I felt truly captivated by his historical narrative, which made me add a half star to my rating! Yet, as the story progressed, this engagement waned. Ramsey’s insistence that his cohort emerged largely unscathed from the epidemic simply baffled me. In doing so, he overlooked the complexities of how trauma from this period continues to ripple through generations, particularly among kids in today’s landscape of rising opioid dependency.
As if that weren’t frustrating enough, Ramsey’s tendency to provide abrupt conclusions to his interviewees’ stories left me wanting. Imagine hearing about a person’s struggles only for their narrative to conclude just as they seemed poised for transformation. What happened to these individuals afterward? I craved that “where are they now” element, which would have lent much-needed depth to the tapestry he so meticulously started to weave.
The real kicker, though, was his unsettling language around addiction. Ramsey often referenced “crackheads” while simultaneously claiming to understand the humanity behind these struggles. It felt hypocritical and perpetuated the very stigma he sought to challenge. And despite some light on historical parallels with the modern opioid crisis, his failure to connect these narratives left me overwhelmingly disappointed.
In conclusion, When Crack Was King is a misstep that squanders its rich potential. While Ramsey’s historical groundwork is commendable, the book’s disjointed narratives and lack of depth in tackling its issues render it less effective than it could have been. If you seek a nuanced exploration of how the crack epidemic informs modern challenges around addiction, you might want to look elsewhere. For me, this experience serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of thoughtful storytelling, and I can only hope that a more adept author will rise to tell this story with the nuance and depth it truly merits.
Discover more about When Crack Was King: A People's History of a Misunderst… on GoodReads >>
